Category Archives: Uncategorized

Wake Me Up When the Game’s Over

We live in a world of ever-increasing impatience.

To a large extent, this is the result of technological “improvements”. It takes a long time to huff and puff up 30 flights of stairs in an office building. Yet how often do you see people in a high-speed elevator jabbing the “door closed” button if said doors stay open two seconds longer than expected?

Similarly, with the advent of turbo-charged hand dryers, who has time for those quaint low-powered models that take twice as long to dry your paws? And if Google takes more than a nanosecond to complete a search, we figure there’s something wrong with the Internet.

Indeed, you’re probably getting impatient with how long it’s taking me to make my point. Which is this: I figure a number of professional sports take so long to conduct their business that they’re bound to lose, or never attract, the attention of a younger generation accustomed to fast-paced action (think video games) and instant results.

I could pick any number of American-based pro sports leagues, which are collectively beholden to massive TV contracts and all the commercial interruptions they demand. Is there anything more maddening or interest deadening than the commercial breaks following a National Football League touchdown and then another TV timeout following the ensuing kickoff? I’ll tell you, the Netflix generation ain’t going to like that.

And with the growing American interest in world soccer, aren’t stateside fans going to notice there’s 45-plus minutes of commercial-free action per half? That is if you ignore the minute-long writhing on the ground from fake injuries or all the posturing that goes on before free kicks.

I always figured you only needed to watch the last two minutes of a National Basketball Association game, which in real time routinely takes 15 minutes to complete, given all the timeouts, intentional fouls and excruciatingly slow foul shots. Just put me out of my misery.

Given their low status on the totem pole, National Hockey League games do move along with greater dispatch. There’s nothing finer in pro sports, I contend, than playoff overtime, with virtually no stoppages for up to 20 heart-pounding, sudden-death minutes.

There are two professional sports which I figure are in particular peril for their tortoise-like state of play and potential risk of becoming irrelevant to younger would-be fans. One is Major League Baseball, where the average game in 2014 took three hours and 14 minutes to complete, with 23 seconds between pitches. Who needs a sleeping pill when you’re watching that on the couch?

A committee has been struck to speed up play, but we know what happens with committees. They spawn other committees. Expect a result in three years and 14 weeks.

The other slow-as-molasses game is professional golf. I know these guys are putting for a lot of dough. But they would do well to take one less practice swing, forgo plotting every swale on a green and, especially, heed my father’s sage advice: Miss ’em quick.

Just yesterday, I watched in amazement as an impending playoff was held up by 1) the disappearance of the players for the obligatory signing of scorecards (does any other sport in the world depend on the participants to keep score?) 2) the long cart ride to the start of the first playoff hole, on the 18th tee, and 3) the drawing of who-hits-first numbers and then hand shaking all around.

I know the biggest gallery is surrounding the 18th green, but there are millions more watching on television who would no doubt appreciate a much quicker dash to the nearby first tee. On this particular Sunday, the playoff went to a second hole, which involved an even longer cart ride from the 18th green back to the 16th tee.

At that moment—after all the dicking around of generally glacial play and riding around in carts to unconnected playoff holes—the play-by-play guy announced that TV coverage would be terminated for all viewers except on the west coast. Thanks for watching for four hours! Too bad we couldn’t show you the conclusion. Can you imagine the latest Super Bowl coverage ending 30 seconds before that fateful interception?

After all that golf inaction, I’m sure 18 year olds are signing up en masse for the Golf Channel. As for those of you who say these waste-of-a-day sports will never lose their popularity, I have two words: Horse racing.

My 15 Favourite Road Trip Songs of 2014

People often ask me what music I listen to on road trips. To be honest, no one’s asked. But that’s never stopped me before.

Actually, once I’ve settled into the rhythm of a road trip, I don’t listen to a  lot of music or radio, other than a bit of right-wing ranting (for the hell of it) or NPR (RIP Car Talk). But nothing gets me through a long-stretch of interstate or late-night driving like a surge of juiced-up music.

Hence this list of mostly poppy music, the vast majority released in 2014. The list is dominated by women, which either says something about me or the state of indie music.

15. Best Coast: Fear of My Identity
When needed, this 2013 song gives me a straight shot of adrenaline. Instantly, I’m bouncing around the car… while, of course, keeping my hands on the wheel and eyes on the road.

14. First Aid Kit: My Silver Lining 
A more theme-oriented song was the Soderberg sisters’ cover of Willie Nelson’s classic
“On the Road Again”, but it was only around briefly as a Volvo commercial on Swedish TV. But the lyric in this piece, “I won’t take the easy road”, steers things back in the right direction.

13. EMA: Cthulu

Does anyone slowly build to emotional climaxes like EMA?

12. The War on Drugs: An Ocean in Between the Waves
Comparisons have been made to Springsteen and Mark Knofler. No matter. Just enjoy this unfashionably long, guitar-driven rocker.

11. Bettye LaVette: Hustlin’
The gritty, bluesy theme song for the U.S. version of the TV show Low Winter Sun, cancelled after one, 2013, season (watch it on Netflix). Bettye’s own career has been counted down and out (like this number about embattled Detroit), but she’s persevered over decades to add richness to that glorious, soulful voice.

10. Jenny Lewis: Just One of the Guys
A great song on all levels, examining the ticking clock women face.

9. alt-J: Breezeblocks

British indie band alt-J came out with a much-lauded This is All Yours album in 2014, highlighted by “Left Hand Free.” But on a long road trip, I prefer this change-of-pace song from a couple of years earlier.

8. Courtney Barnett: David
Australian signer-songwriter-guitarist Courtney Barnett’s terrific double CD was released in North America in 2014. “David” crashes the list  just for this lyric: “I don’t really like any of your friends, But it’s not that hard for me to pretend.”

7. Tune-Yards: Water Fountain
Tune-Yards, aka Merrill Garbus, is one of the most frenetically creative people in the business, combining music, art and dance into a mesmerizing mix. Just watch the video.

6. Laura Marling: Master Hunter

Nearly every reviewer notes how talented and accomplished this British folk musician is, releasing her fifth album at age 24. I concur.

5. Dum Dum Girls: Rimbaud Eyes
Can one get overdosed on the revival of surfer guitars? I say not. If this song doesn’t revive me on a long drive, I must be in a food-induced coma.

4. Rosanne Cash: A Feather’s Not a Bird

This early 2014, beautifully crafted song never slipped from my top five all year.

3. Spoon: Let Me Be Mine
The consistently best rock band of the past two decades.

2. Shovels & Rope: The Devil is All Around
In an era of downloading single songs from iTunes, one could throw a dart at the list of songs on this South Carolina duo’s latest album, Swimmin Time, and hit a winner every time. Michael Trent and Cary Ann Hearst play all the instruments, but it’s their soaring harmonies that knock this recording out of the park.

1. St. Vincent: Psychopath
St. Vincent (aka Annie Clarke) is perhaps the best, most inventive musician going, and she certainly hits her stride on this self-titled album. I could easily pick any number of great songs, but this one’s flown a little under the radar.

What are your favourite driving songs of 2014? Just hit the reply button at the top of the post and contribute to the dance session.

What’s in a Name? Some Peculiar Western Monikers

The original name of Hot Springs may have been more accurate, but you've got to admit the current name of this New Mexico city is more eye catching

The original name of Hot Springs may have been more accurate, but you’ve got to admit the current name of this New Mexico city is more eye catching

In his seminal travel book Blue Highways, author William Least Heat-Moon explored U.S. back roads, sometimes taking long detours just to visit a place with a compelling moniker. This led him to towns such as Nameless, Tennessee.

In the course of my road-food journeys through western North America, I’ve seen my share of creatively named towns, either in passing or when poring over highway maps. Hence this list of attention-grabbing names. Admittedly, a number of these places are unincorporated communities, a few no longer populated, but where’s the fun in pointing that out?

There’s no Nameless in the U.S. west, but there is a No Name in Colorado and a Nothing in Arizona, the latter concisely answering the question: “What’s there to do in your town?”

Also under the “let’s not attract tourists” category, it’s an epic battle between Arizona—boasting Why, Gripe and Goobertown—and Oregon countering with Boring, Idiotville, and Nimrod (apparently, the main town sign in the latter has been bolted down to keep it from being stolen). California vaults into third place with Bummerville, Hellhole Palms and Clapper Gap, while Idaho narrowly misses the podium with Slickpoo.

You might have better luck luring visitors with sexual innuendo. So argues Climax (Colorado) or, more perversely, Camel Hump (Wyoming). I dare not guess what Washington’s Humptulips stands for.

In California, the restless spirit of Deadman Crossing is countered by the fatalism of Dunmovin. Speaking of spirits, Idaho has Beer Bottle Crossing, while California features two places that likely don’t do much business: Condemned Bar and Mormon Bar. Chugwater (Wyoming) is apparently what happens when you run out of beer.

Stoner was obviously ready for Colorado’s new liberal marijuana laws. Weed (California) and Weed Heights (Nevada) are hoping their states follow suit.

Want the last name in any directory? California has that covered with Zzyzx, narrowly edging out Oregon’s Zig Zag; don’t vowels count for something?

How would you feel about visiting two Montana towns, Prison Farm or Square Butte? What about Blubber Bay or Spuzzum, both in British Columbia, or Alberta’s Hairy Hill? Don’t forget your Hygiene in Colorado or you won’t get to visit Santa Claus, in Arizona of all places.

Sometimes a seemingly strange name means something. Helper, Utah was named for the extra train engines needed to haul long lines of freight cars up steep grades nearby.

 A true story: New Mexico’s Hot Springs changed its name in the 1950s to that of a TV show, Truth or Consequences, looking for a town willing to do just that. In 1999, Internet startup Half.com gave the town of Halfway, Oregon $100,000 and some computers to change its name to that of the company for a year. But truth in advertising obviously failed Alberta’s Seven Persons, which actually has 230 residents.

Why not have some fun with your community name? In Saskatchewan, there’s long been a town entrance sign that reads, “New York may be big, but this is Biggar.”

Finally, this is a road-food blog, so it’s fitting to end things with a New Mexican place named for a 1920s’ bakery that made dried-apple pies. It’s called Pie Town. If you happen to be passing through, stop for a slab of real pie at Pie-O-Neer. Its motto: “If you bake it, they will come.” Amen.

Restaurant Restrooms: The Most Important Space in the Place?

Giving new mean to the word "restroom" at Emma's Kitchen in Laurel, Montana

Giving new meaning to the word “restroom” at Emma’s Kitchen in Laurel, Montana

On a month-long road food research trip, I might visit more than 100 eateries and coffee shops. Which means that, because of my t.b. (tiny bladder), I visit about the same number of bathrooms, or restrooms as they call them in the States. So after awhile, I get a pretty good sense of what makes a good restaurant washroom, to introduce a third term (I promise, I won’t add “water closet”).

Continue reading

Seeing the Light: It’s Time to Switch to LEDs

Three generations of light bulbs: Left, a 7.5-watt LED (cool to the touch), Middle, 100-watt incandescent (scalding), Right, 11-watt CFL (warm)

Three generations of light bulbs: Left, a 7.5-watt LED (cool to the touch), Middle, 100-watt incandescent (scalding), Right, 11-watt CFL (warm)

A brief interruption in the road-trip gorging to address the misconceptions surrounding the impending demise of the traditional incandescent light bulb.

As you may have heard, the U.S. and Canadian governments are banning the manufacture or import of incandescent bulbs. The U.S. actually started in 2012 and has just completed the ban, while Canada won’t be finished for another year, though consumers in both countries can still purchase the bulbs while store supplies last.

Perhaps predictably, there has been some hoarding, along with much wailing in some quarters (http://freedomlightbulb.blogspot.ca). Why?

  • Incandescent bulbs are dirt cheap, often less than $1 apiece
  • Many folks are accustomed to the yellowish light cast by an incandescent
  • “No damn government is telling me what to do/taking away my freedom to burn energy… blah, blah, blah”.

The reason governments are doing this—the legislation was introduced under neocons George Bush in the U.S. and Stephen Harper in Canada, by the way—is to promote energy efficiency. Previous administrations passed similar laws regarding the efficiency of everything from refrigerators and clothes washers to vehicles.

Back then, there was an initial outcry about the impossibility of meeting these new targets and the high cost to consumers of doing so. But manufacturers did what business does best: They innovated and, through economies of scale and technological improvements, brought prices down and slashed energy consumption.

Let me point out that the incandescent light bulb is one of the most inefficient of inventions. Indeed, early electric companies often gave bulbs away just so they could make money on the power consumed (kind of like printers and ink cartridges, but I digress).

Converting some 90 per cent of its energy to heat, the old-fashioned incandescent bulb is just a mini space heater

Converting some 90 per cent of its energy to heat, the old-fashioned incandescent bulb is just a mini space heater

Roughly 10 per cent of a traditional incandescent bulb’s energy goes to producing light. The remaining 90 per cent is wasted as heat. Effectively, it’s a very inefficient space heater. Incandescents also last as little as 1,000 hours, meaning they have to be replaced every few years. Note: There are improved incandescents, but they’re still not very efficient.

So what’s the solution? Many people assume it’s compact fluorescent lights (CFLs). These corkscrew-shaped bulbs have been around for about a decade, are about 75 per cent efficient, last perhaps 10,000 hours and have plunged in price from about $20 to around $4 or less apiece—it’s that economy of scale and innovation I was talking about earlier.

The CFL is a big step up in efficiency but has some problems

The CFL is a big step up in efficiency but has some problems

But CFLs aren’t universally popular. For one, the light takes a few seconds to turn on and get up to speed. For another, CFLs don’t always take kindly to dimmer switches. Finally, they contain mercury and are thus a bit tricky to safely dispose of. This last point is one incandescent defenders/hoarders really seize on, which is a bit rich coming from folks who are otherwise hardly defenders of the environment.

The real point is CFLs are yesterday’s technology. I’m here to tell you the future—light-emitting diode bulbs, or LEDs—is already here. They’re increasingly showing up in street and traffic lights, exit signs and, of course, headlamps that never seem to burn out. But they’re also about to hit the consumer mainstream.

The future is now with highly efficient LEDs that may last longer than you do

The future is now with highly efficient, increasingly affordable LEDs that may last longer than you do

LEDs are a definite step up on CFLs. They’re about 80 per cent efficient, meaning a 9.5-watt LED will produce the same amount of light as a 60-watt incandescent. They also turn on instantly,  are dimmable, increasingly produce light similar to incandescents and  contain no mercury. Did I mention, they never seem to burn out? I recently bought one for a desk lamp that is estimated to last 36 years, which will pretty much see me out.

The only remaining knock against them is the price. When I first heard of them, LEDs cost some $40 apiece, which made for a hard sell in terms of energy savings/payback.

But remember that earlier bit about economies of scale/technology development? Well, in the past year or so, the price of an LED bulb has fallen to first about $20 and now to nearly $10 for a newer, pancake-shape bulb (60-watt equivalent) produced by Philips.

The other day, I went to Costco, which has an impressive selection of LED bulbs, including a three-bulb package of 40-watt equivalent bulbs—plenty for reading or bathroom vanities—for only $20, or less than $7 apiece. There was also a $10, 60-watt equivalent, with a four-year warrantee and a lifespan of some 40,000 hours. At 10 cents a kilowatt hour, used for three hours a day, this bulb will use only 16 per cent of the electricity of an equivalent incandescent and should save me $190 in power costs over its decades-long lifetime. That’s just for one of maybe two dozen lights in a typical house; lighting typically accounts for 10-15 per cent of electricity consumed in the average home. And prices on these LED bulbs are only going to keep falling.

So forget, for a moment, the environmental/climate change argument of incandescent bulbs consuming way more energy than is necessary. There’s also no longer a real economic argument for keeping them in use. It’s just stupid.

When it Comes to Paying for Parking, I’m No Dummy

They certainly like to make street parking in Seattle complicated

They certainly like to make street parking in Seattle complicated

My general rule for road-trip dining is to pay for parking only when absolutely necessary. But cities, particularly their downtown areas, conspire against this. Which forces me to carry a bunch of coins or figure out how to use their credit card machines or attach receipts to windows (see photo above).

So all this plugging of downtown parking meters—constantly checking my watch and devouring my meal to make sure I won’t get ticketed or towed—has got me thinking. You know how parking patrollers will rarely bother you if you’re sitting in your car? They must think you’re either about to get out of your car, and plug the meter, or about to leave.

So why not just plunk a dummy in the driver’s seat while you’re dining nearby? You know, like those uniformed policemen dummies you see in old patrol cars, to get you to slow down in small towns. Wouldn’t that work?

If a dummy can get people to slow down, maybe it can be used to avoid paying for parking

If a dummy can get people to slow down, maybe it can be used to avoid paying for parking